Golden State Warriors Kalah Dari Indiana Pacers di Chase Center

Indiana Pacers vs Golden State Warriors_Stratetgibola
Indiana Pacers vs Golden State Warriors_Stratetgibola

StrategibolaGolden State Warriors menjamu Indiana Pacers di Chase Center pada Senin malam dalam rangkaian dua pertandingan kandang mereka selama liburan. Warriors baru saja mengantongi kemenangan atas Minnesota Timberwolves, sementara Pacers berusaha menyapu bersih perjalanan tandang mereka dengan rekor 3-0 dan memperpanjang kemenangan beruntun menjadi lima.

Bacaan Lainnya

Dalam pertandingan penuh tensi selama 48 menit, Indiana Pacers akhirnya keluar sebagai pemenang dengan skor 111-105. Kemenangan ini memastikan mereka menyapu bersih tiga laga tandang sekaligus mencatatkan lima kemenangan berturut-turut sebelum melakoni laga pasca-Natal melawan Oklahoma City Thunder.

 

Sorotan Pemain
Myles Turner tampil gemilang dengan mencatatkan 23 poin, 10 rebound, dan tiga blok untuk Pacers. Semua pemain inti Pacers juga menyumbangkan poin dua digit, termasuk TJ McConnell dari bangku cadangan yang menambah 13 poin. Sang motor serangan, Tyrese Haliburton, menutup laga dengan torehan 16 poin, enam rebound, dan 12 assist.

Di sisi Warriors, Jonathan Kuminga menjadi penyelamat dari bangku cadangan dengan raihan 26 poin. Andrew Wiggins menyumbangkan 16 poin, sementara Trayce Jackson-Davis menambahkan 13 poin dan delapan rebound. Sayangnya, Steph Curry tampil di bawah performa dengan hanya mencetak 10 poin dari 2 tembakan masuk dari 13 percobaan.

 


Ringkasan Pertandingan

Kuarter Pertama
Pertandingan dimulai dengan tempo tinggi. Warriors dan Pacers saling bertukar serangan di lima menit awal. Indiana mencoba mendominasi dengan keunggulan tujuh poin, namun Warriors tidak membiarkan mereka terlalu jauh. Pada akhir kuarter pertama, Pacers unggul tipis 31-30. Steph Curry tampil kurang maksimal, hanya mencoba satu tembakan yang gagal.

Kuarter Kedua
Warriors menunjukkan kebangkitan di awal kuarter kedua, bahkan sempat memimpin. Namun, Pacers merespons dengan pertahanan kokoh dan menghapus defisit sembilan poin. Pada jeda babak pertama, Pacers unggul 62-54 dengan empat pemainnya mencetak poin dua digit. Di sisi lain, Steph Curry hanya berhasil menambahkan dua poin untuk Warriors.

Kuarter Ketiga
Kuarter ketiga berlangsung panas dengan Warriors mencoba mengejar ketertinggalan. Pacers berhasil menjaga keunggulan hingga 12 poin menjelang akhir kuarter. Namun, Warriors mempersempit jarak menjadi 89-85 saat kuarter ketiga usai.

Kuarter Keempat
Pertarungan memuncak di kuarter terakhir dengan kedua tim saling bergantian memimpin hingga tiga menit terakhir. Pacers berhasil menutup pertandingan dengan kontribusi Andrew Nembhard dan Myles Turner, sementara Steph Curry gagal mencetak poin di momen-momen penentuan. Indiana mengakhiri laga dengan kemenangan 111-105.


Analisis Pasca-Pertandingan

Kemenangan ini menjadi momentum penting bagi Indiana Pacers yang terus menunjukkan konsistensi permainan. Mereka akan kembali ke kandang untuk merayakan Natal sebelum menghadapi Oklahoma City Thunder pada 26 Desember.

Sebaliknya, kekalahan ini menjadi catatan buruk bagi Warriors jelang laga klasik melawan Los Angeles Lakers pada 25 Desember. Duel Steph Curry dan LeBron James di pertandingan Natal akan menjadi salah satu laga yang paling dinanti oleh para penggemar NBA.

Tetap pantau Strategibola.com untuk informasi terbaru seputar NBA dan berita olahraga lainnya!

 

NBA 2024-25 Regular Season Standings

Atlantic Division

Team w L WIN% GB CONF DIV HOME ROAD Neutral OT LAST10 STREAK
1
 Logo

Boston Celtics

22 7 .759 20-5 4-0 11-4 11-3 0-0 2-1 6-4 L 1
2
 Logo

New York Knicks

19 10 .655 3 14-7 5-1 9-4 10-6 0-0 0-0 8-2 W 4
3
 Logo

Brooklyn Nets

11 18 .379 11 5-15 1-5 5-8 6-10 0-0 0-2 2-8 L 2
4
 Logo

Philadelphia 76ers

10 17 .370 11 9-10 1-2 5-9 5-8 0-0 2-1 7-3 W 1
5
 Logo

Toronto Raptors

7 23 .233 15.5 4-13 1-4 6-10 1-13 0-0 1-2 2-8 L 8

Central Division

Team w L WIN% GB CONF DIV HOME ROAD Neutral OT LAST10 STREAK
1
 Logo

Cleveland Cavaliers

26 4 .867 20-4 6-0 17-1 9-3 0-0 0-0 9-1 W 5
2
 Logo

Milwaukee Bucks

16 12 .571 9 14-11 5-4 10-4 5-8 1-0 1-0 7-3 W 2
3
 Logo

Indiana Pacers

15 15 .500 11 8-12 2-2 8-4 7-11 0-0 1-1 6-4 W 5
4
 Logo

Chicago Bulls

13 17 .433 13 11-10 2-5 4-11 9-6 0-0 0-0 5-5 L 2
5
 Logo

Detroit Pistons

13 17 .433 13 10-14 1-5 5-8 8-9 0-0 2-2 5-5 W 2

Southeast Division

Team w L WIN% GB CONF DIV HOME ROAD Neutral OT LAST10 STREAK
1
 Logo

Orlando Magic

19 12 .613 15-7 5-0 12-2 7-10 0-0 0-0 5-5 W 2
2
 Logo

Miami Heat

14 13 .519 3 10-9 3-2 9-5 4-8 1-0 1-2 5-5 W 1
3
 Logo

Atlanta Hawks

15 15 .500 3.5 10-7 3-2 8-7 7-7 0-1 1-1 6-4 W 1
4
 Logo

Charlotte Hornets

7 22 .241 11 6-20 0-7 5-11 2-11 0-0 1-1 1-9 L 5
5
 Logo

Washington Wizards

4 23 .148 13 3-15 3-3 3-10 1-12 0-1 0-0 2-8 L 2

Northwest Division

Team w L WIN% GB CONF DIV HOME ROAD Neutral OT LAST10 STREAK
1
 Logo

Oklahoma City Thunder

23 5 .821 16-5 4-1 11-2 11-3 1-0 0-0 9-1 W 8
2
 Logo

Denver Nuggets

16 11 .593 6.5 11-8 3-3 8-4 8-7 0-0 3-0 6-4 W 2
3
 Logo

Minnesota Timberwolves

14 14 .500 9 11-9 2-2 8-6 6-8 0-0 1-1 6-4 L 3
4
 Logo

Portland Trail Blazers

9 20 .310 14.5 8-19 3-4 6-7 3-13 0-0 0-0 2-8 L 2
5
 Logo

Utah Jazz

7 21 .250 16 3-19 1-3 2-10 5-11 0-0 0-0 3-7 L 1

Pacific Division

Team w L WIN% GB CONF DIV HOME ROAD Neutral OT LAST10 STREAK
1
 Logo

LA Clippers

17 13 .567 12-12 4-2 10-6 7-7 0-0 0-1 5-5 W 1
2
 Logo

Los Angeles Lakers

16 13 .552 0.5 13-7 4-2 9-4 7-9 0-0 0-1 5-5 L 1
3
 Logo

Golden State Warriors

15 13 .536 1 12-10 0-3 7-6 8-7 0-0 1-0 3-7 L 1
4
 Logo

Phoenix Suns

14 14 .500 2 12-7 5-3 9-6 5-8 0-0 1-1 4-6 L 3
5
 Logo

Sacramento Kings

13 17 .433 4 10-13 2-5 6-11 7-6 0-0 1-2 4-6 L 4

Southwest Division

Team w L WIN% GB CONF DIV HOME ROAD Neutral OT LAST10 STREAK
1
 Logo

Houston Rockets

20 9 .690 12-7 5-1 11-3 9-5 0-1 2-1 7-3 W 3
2
 Logo

Memphis Grizzlies

20 10 .667 0.5 8-7 1-2 13-4 7-6 0-0 0-0 7-3 L 1
3
 Logo

Dallas Mavericks

19 10 .655 1 13-8 4-1 10-4 9-6 0-0 0-1 8-2 W 2
4
 Logo

San Antonio Spurs

15 14 .517 5 13-12 2-4 11-7 4-7 0-0 1-0 5-5 L 1
5
 Logo

New Orleans Pelicans

5 25 .167 15.5 3-14 0-4 4-11 1-14 0-0 0-1 1-9 L 7
xClinched Playoff Berth
oEliminated from Playoffs contention
eClinched Eastern Conference
wClinched Western Conference
nwClinched Northwest Division
pClinched Pacific Division
swClinched Southwest Division
aClinched Atlantic Division
psClinched Postseason
cClinched Central Division
seClinched Southeast Division
piClinched Play-In

TIEBREAKER BASIS FOR TWO-WAY TIES:

  • (-) Tie breaker not needed (better overall winning percentage)
  • (1) Head-to-head won-lost percentage
  • (2) Division leader wins tie from team not leading a division
  • (3) Division won-lost percentage for teams in the same division
  • (4) Conference won-lost percentage
  • (5) W-L Percentage vs. Playoff eligible teams, own conference
  • (6) W-L Percentage vs. Playoff eligible teams, other conference
  • (7) Net Points, all games

TIEBREAKER BASIS FOR MULTI-WAY TIES:

  • (-) Tie breaker not needed (better overall winning percentage)
  • (1) Division leader wins tie from team not leading a division
  • (2) Head-to-head won-lost percentage
  • (3) Division won-lost percentage for teams in the same division
  • (4) Conference won-lost percentage
  • (5) W-L Percentage vs. Playoff eligible teams, own conference
  • (6) W-L Percentage vs. Playoff eligible teams, other conference
  • (7) Net Points, all games

Strength of Schedule:

Looks at the opponents for your remaining games, their winning percentage on the road or at home, and whether or not either team is on the second night of a back to back.

Ties for playoff positions (including division winners) will be broken utilizing the criteria set forth in subparagraph a. below (in the case of ties involving two teams) and subparagraph b. below (in the case of ties involving more than two teams), and the guidelines set forth in subparagraph c. below.

a. Two Teams Tied. In the case of a tie in regular-season records involving only two teams, the following criteria will be utilized in the following order:

  • (1) Better winning percentage in games against each other.
  • (2) Division winner (this criterion is applied regardless of whether the tied teams are in the same division).
  • (3) Better winning percentage against teams in own division (only if tied teams are in same division).
  • (4) Better winning percentage against teams in own conference.
  • (5) Better winning percentage in games against teams eligible for the postseason in own conference (including teams that finished the Regular Season tied for one of the best 10 records in their conference).
  • (6) Better winning percentage in games against teams eligible for the postseason in opposite conference (including teams that finished the Regular Season tied for one of the best 10 records in their conference).
  • (7) Better net result of total points scored less total points allowed against all opponents (“point differential”).

b. More Than Two Teams Tied. In the case of a tie in regular-season records involving more than two teams, the following criteria will be utilized in the following order:

  • (1) Division winner (this criterion is applied regardless of whether the tied teams are in the same division).
  • (2) Better winning percentage in all games among the tied teams.
  • (3) Better winning percentage against teams in own division (only if all tied teams are in same division).
  • (4) Better winning percentage against teams in own conference.
  • (5) Better winning percentage in games against teams eligible for the postseason in own conference (including teams that finished the Regular Season tied for one of the best 10 records in their conference).
  • (6) Better net result of total points scored less total points allowed against all opponents (“point differential”).

c. Guidelines For Applying Tie-Break Criteria. The following guidelines shall be used when applying the above criteria to break ties for playoff positions:

  • (1)(a) Ties to determine the division winners must be broken before any other ties.
  • (b) When a tie must be broken to determine a division winner, the results of the tie-break shall be used to determine only the division winner, and not for any other purpose.
  • (2) If a tie involves more than two teams, the tie-break criteria in subparagraph b. shall be applied in the order set forth therein until the first to occur of the following:
  • (a) Each of the tied teams has a different winning percentage or point differential under the applicable tie-break criterion (a “complete” breaking of the tie). In this circumstance, the team with the best winning percentage or point differential under the criterion will be awarded the best playoff position, the team with the next-best winning percentage or point differential will be awarded the next-best playoff position, and so on, and no further application of the tie-break criteria will be required.
  • — OR —
  • (b) One or more (but not all) of the tied teams has a different winning percentage or point differential under the applicable tie-break criterion (a “partial” breaking of the tie). In this circumstance: (x) any team(s) that performed better under the applicable criterion than any other team(s) will be awarded a higher playoff position than such other team(s); and (y) teams that had equivalent performance under the applicable criterion will remain tied, and such remaining tie(s) will be broken by applying, from the beginning, the criteria in subparagraph a.(1)-(6) above (for any remaining tie involving only two teams) or subparagraph b.(1)-(5) above (for any remaining tie involving more than two teams) and the guidelines set forth in this subparagraph c.
  • (3) If application of the criteria in subparagraph a. or b. does not result in the breaking of a tie, the playoff positions of the tied teams will be determined by a random drawing.

Pos terkait